Data

The Incentive Travel Index: 2025 Benchmarks Every Planner Should Know

2,708 respondents, one benchmark. Here's the ITI 2025 digest — the per-person spend, where planners are cutting, and why AI adoption exploded.

9 min read · IncentiveTrips
Last updated July 3, 2026
The Incentive Travel Index: 2025 Benchmarks Every Planner Should Know
Photo via Unsplash

If you plan incentive travel and you read one industry benchmark a year, make it the Incentive Travel Index. Produced by SITE and the Incentive Research Foundation, the 2025 edition drew on 2,708 respondents across buyers, suppliers, and destinations — making it the closest thing this fragmented industry has to a single source of truth. Here's the digest: the numbers that matter, what changed, and what to do with them.

The headline number: $5,100 per person

The ITI 2025 pegs the global average per-person spend at roughly $5,100 — up about 4% year over year. That increase is notable in a cost-conscious climate: budgets rose even as planners actively hunted for savings. The read is that incentive travel is holding its ground as a retention and performance tool precisely because the labor market makes top performers hard to keep. When the war for talent is hot, the trip is cheaper than the turnover.

ITI 2025 benchmarkFigureDirection
Average per-person spend~$5,100▲ ~4% YoY
Survey respondents2,708Buyers + suppliers + destinations
Using ChatGPT in some capacity93%▲ sharply
Using Microsoft Copilot~74%
Using AI for program design~35%Emerging

Cost pressure is real — and here's where planners are cutting

Spend rose, but not without a fight. The ITI documents exactly which levers planners pulled to contain costs, and the ranking is instructive because it shows what buyers are willing to sacrifice first.

Cost-trim tacticShare of planners using it
Reduce gifting~45%
Choose cheaper destinations~42%
Shorten trip length~42%

The telling detail: the most popular cut is gifting, not the experience itself. Planners protect the trip — the emotional core — and trim the swag. That aligns with everything the research says about why non-cash rewards work: it's the memory and the recognition that drive value, not the branded backpack. Read our full breakdown of incentive travel on a budget for how to apply these levers without gutting the program.

Destination substitution, not elimination

Notice that "cheaper destinations" ranks near the top while "cancel the program" appears nowhere. The market response to cost pressure is substitution — swapping a marquee international destination for a strong regional one — rather than retreat. That's a healthy signal for the category and a practical playbook for planners: the goal is to preserve the aspirational feel at a lower landed cost, which our destination guides are built to help with.

The AI story is the biggest change in the index

The single most dramatic shift in ITI 2025 is adoption of AI. A striking 93% of respondents report using ChatGPT in some capacity, and roughly 74% use Microsoft Copilot. This is no longer experimental — it's ambient. Where planners actually apply it breaks down like this:

Top AI use in incentive planningShare of planners
Content creation (comms, copy, marketing)61%
Destination research51%
Program design35%

The pattern is that AI penetrates fastest where the task is text-heavy and low-risk — writing the announcement email — and slower where judgment and stakes rise, like program design. That 35% program-design figure is the one to watch: it's the frontier. For the full picture, see our guide to AI in incentive travel planning.

What the ITI is — and why it's the benchmark to trust

The Incentive Travel Index is an annual global study jointly produced by SITE (the Society for Incentive Travel Excellence) and the Incentive Research Foundation, with support from the Financial and Insurance Conference Professionals. It surveys the full ecosystem — corporate buyers, agency intermediaries, hotels, DMCs, and destinations — which is why its per-person and sentiment figures are broadly cited as the industry standard. The 2025 wave's 2,708 responses give it statistical weight that single-vendor surveys can't match. When a benchmark number gets quoted in an incentive travel article without a source, it usually traces back here.

How to use ITI numbers in your own budget deck

Three practical moves. First, use the $5,100 global average as a defensible anchor, then adjust for region — North America runs higher — so your CFO sees you're benchmarking, not guessing. Second, cite the 4% YoY increase to preempt the "why is this more expensive" question with market context. Third, deploy the cost-trim ranking proactively: show leadership you've already modeled the gifting, destination, and duration levers before they ask you to cut. Walking in with the industry benchmark reframes you from a spender to a steward.

Sentiment: optimism holds, but tempered

Beyond the hard numbers, the ITI tracks how the ecosystem feels about the year ahead — and 2025's read is cautiously optimistic. Buyers and suppliers alike expect program activity to grow, driven by the same talent-retention logic pushing budgets up. But that optimism is tempered by cost anxiety and economic uncertainty, which is precisely why the cost-trim tactics above are so widely deployed. The mood isn't retreat — it's disciplined expansion. Planners want to keep doing more, and they're getting sharper about how they pay for it.

That combination — rising activity plus rising discipline — is the defining tension of the modern incentive travel market. It rewards planners who can hold two ideas at once: incentive travel is worth investing in and every dollar has to be defensible. The ITI is the instrument that lets you speak to both halves of that equation with data instead of opinion.

The wellness signal you shouldn't miss

One benchmark that connects the ITI to the broader research: wellness is now embedded in the vast majority of programs — the IRF puts it at 81% in 2026. That's a structural shift in what qualifiers expect from a reward, and it shows up in the ITI's experience-design data too. The read for planners is simple: budget for restoration, not just revelry. A trip that sends people home recharged does more for retention than one that just wears them out, and the benchmarks now reflect that expectation as the norm rather than the exception.

The bottom line from ITI 2025

Incentive travel is growing more expensive, more measured, and more AI-assisted — all at once. Budgets are up 4% because the tool works and talent is scarce; planners are cutting gifting before experience because they understand what actually drives value; and AI has gone from novelty to near-universal. The planners who thrive in this environment are the ones who treat the ITI as a strategic instrument, not trivia. Pair these benchmarks with the 2026 Incentive Travel Trends Report and our analysis of the full 2026 statistics to build your case.

Gallery

Analyst reviewing incentive travel index benchmark data on laptop
Photo via Unsplash
Team analyzing charts and spend benchmarks in a meeting
Photo via Unsplash
Modern office where incentive travel planners benchmark budgets
Photo via Unsplash

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Incentive Travel Index?
The Incentive Travel Index (ITI) is an annual global study produced by SITE and the Incentive Research Foundation. It surveys the full ecosystem — corporate buyers, agencies, hotels, and destinations — and is widely cited as the industry's benchmark. The 2025 wave drew on 2,708 respondents.
What is the average incentive travel spend per person in 2025?
Roughly $5,100 per person globally, up about 4% year over year according to the ITI 2025. North America typically runs higher than the global average. The increase reflects incentive travel holding value as a retention tool in a tight labor market.
How are planners cutting incentive travel costs?
The ITI 2025 shows the top three cost-trim tactics are reducing gifting (~45%), choosing cheaper destinations (~42%), and shortening trip length (~42%). Notably, planners cut gifting before the core experience — they protect the memory and recognition that drive the program's value.
How many planners use AI in incentive travel?
According to ITI 2025, 93% of respondents use ChatGPT in some capacity and about 74% use Microsoft Copilot. Roughly 35% now use AI specifically for program design — the emerging frontier as adoption moves from text tasks toward higher-stakes judgment work.
What do planners use AI for most?
The top uses are content creation at 61% (comms, copy, marketing), destination research at 51%, and program design at 35%. AI penetrates fastest where tasks are text-heavy and low-risk, and slower where judgment and stakes are higher.
Why did incentive travel spend rise despite cost pressure?
Because the tool works and top talent is scarce. When the labor market is tight, retaining and rewarding top performers via a trip is often cheaper than the cost of turnover — so budgets rose 4% even as planners actively hunted for savings elsewhere, mainly in gifting.
Who produces the Incentive Travel Index?
It's jointly produced by SITE (the Society for Incentive Travel Excellence) and the Incentive Research Foundation, with support from Financial and Insurance Conference Professionals. Its ecosystem-wide sample is why its figures are treated as the industry standard.

Helpful links

Sources & further reading

  1. Incentive Travel Index 2025SITE & Incentive Research Foundation
  2. IRF 2026 Trends & OutlookIncentive Research Foundation
  3. Incentive Travel Market ForecastCoherent Market Insights
  4. U.S. Travel Industry DataU.S. Travel Association
  5. Incentive Travel StatisticsStatista
By Invitation

Get the 2026 Incentive Travel Trends Report

Join a private list of planners, HR leaders, and executives who read the field before the field moves.

Read the 2026 Trends Report